Free Newsletter
 Subscribe Now
 BR Blog

 HOME
Telkom charges stack up, firm says not guilty  Comments
October 30, 2009

  By Ann Crotty


Telkom believes it is "not guilty of the allegations" made against it by the Competition Commission. It said yesterday that the commission's authorities did not have jurisdiction on telecoms pricing.

"We are going to challenge the commission's jurisdiction, as we believe the Independent Communications Authority of SA is our regulator and the appropriate authority on pricing issues in this industry" said Anthony Klopper, the group executive of legal services at Telkom.

Klopper was responding to the commission's announcement that it had referred its findings of abuse of dominance against Telkom to the Competition Tribunal, and had asked the tribunal to levy an administrative penalty of 10 percent on Telkom's annual turnover for the year to March.

Klopper said the issue of jurisdiction was significantly complicated by all the changes to competition legislation and telecoms legislation that had been introduced since 2005 to 2007, the period of the alleged abusive conduct.

He referred to a case that involves the commission and Telkom, scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) on Monday. The case stems from similar allegations originally made by the South African Vans Association. In that matter Telkom went to the High Court and challenged the commission's action on fronts including its jurisdiction. Last year the High Court ruled in Telkom's favour, but made no finding on jurisdiction. The commission appealed the court decision to the SCA, which will hear the case on Monday.


Nandi Mokoena, the manager of strategy and stakeholder relations at the commission, said yesterday that the regulator was confident of the SCA ruling in its favour. Mokeona confirmed that the commission was targeting Telkom's total turnover, although the allegations related only to the provision of basic infrastructure for internet services and virtual private networks, representing a small part of the total turnover.

"The situation is serious; there is more than one complaint and cases have been going on for long," said Mokoena. But Klopper countered that whatever the outcome of the jurisdictional dispute, which would be influenced by the SCA's ruling, any administrative penalty levied on Telkom would be considerably smaller than the R3.5 billion figure mentioned. "The affected turnover represents a tiny proportion of our total turnover."

In a note issued yesterday by Macquarie Securities, Martin Dullart said the outcome of the matter was by no means clear. "The timeline for resolution depends on whether Telkom settles the matter or opposes it. We expect Telkom to oppose, with the commission's jurisdiction over the telecoms industry a clear point of contention."

Dullart said a fine in the region of R3.4bn would be the "worst-case outcome". Telkom did not disclose internet service provider (ISP) revenues, but noted: "FY09 leased line and other data revenues comprised R7.5bn, with ISP revenues likely to be a fraction of that."
BOOKMARK THIS STORY

Social bookmarking allows users to save and categorise a personal collection of bookmarks and share them with others. This is different to using your own browser bookmarks which are available using the menus within your web browser.

Use the links below to share this article on the social bookmarking site of your choice.

Read more about social bookmarking at Wikipedia - Social Bookmarking

Showing page 1 of 1 comment pages, 3 total comments
14 Weeks ago Anonymous wrote :
liking Thesiger's suggestion
14 Weeks ago Arthur wrote :
The guys over at www.hellkom.co.za have come up with a great idea and said that instead of fining tellkom they should rather force them to give their customers free line rental up to the value of what the fine would have been A much better option bcos its our money after all and its us that were abused so give us something back instead of just taking billions from tellkom!
14 Weeks ago Thesiger wrote :
Ah Hellkom. Another monopoly flagrantly abusing its position - quite a familiar refrain these days. Passive consumers make this much worse. And guess who'll pay the fine. Take it from executive bonuses for the next fifty years.
HAVE YOUR SAY
Please enter your comment into the text box below.
Note: all comments are moderated (see our moderation policy) and may take some time to display, or may not appear at all.
If you would like to use an alias, please type it below. If you do not enter an alias you comment under a Anonymous byline.
Type your email address below - your comment will not be accepted without it. This is required as part of our moderation guidelines, but your address will not be published or distributed.
Lastly, to help fight spam, enter the letters in the image below as you see them.

     

BUSINESS SERVICES
Awesome UK Lotto's
Business Directory
Car Insurance
Car Insurance for Women
City Guide
Insurance Quote
Life Insurance
Life Insurance for Women
Maps & Direction
Medical Aid
Meetings Africa
Mobile Business Directory
Online Shopping
Personal Loans
Play Huge Lottos
Property Search
Travel Specials

MOBILE SERVICES
 Get Business Headlines & Indicators
 on your phone - dial *120*IOL*5#
 Click here to find out more (SA only)



News


Markets


Technology News


Company News


International