Free Newsletter
 Subscribe Now
 BR Blog

 HOME
Power prices must treble, Eskom says  Comments

Utility says three annual 45% hikes is the lesser evil

October 14, 2009

By Justin Brown

  • Can you afford to pay Eskom's 45% tariff increase? - click here to vote

    South Africa's ordinary and industrial consumers are in for a huge shock if Eskom wins approval from the state energy regulator to more than treble electricity prices over the three years to April 2013.

    Jacob Maroga, the chief executive of Eskom, yesterday confirmed that the power utility was seeking three annual increases in power prices of 45 percent each, with the first one of these proposed hikes to take effect on April 1 next year.

    Maroga said Eskom could have applied for an increase of 151 percent to an average price of 83c a kilowatt-hour (kWh) with effect from April next year in terms of the government's electricity pricing policy that was approved by the cabinet in December.

    "It is acknowledged that such a significant correction in one year may have a severe impact on customers and the economy," he added.

    Instead, Eskom had applied for a less drastic approach as it sought to fund its capital spending plans, Maroga said.

    "Government has endorsed an approach based on smoothing the price increase," he said.

    The government has loaned Eskom R60 billion and guaranteed R176bn of Eskom's existing and future debt.

    Maroga said the state could add to these guarantees.

    "In the event that appropriate alternatives are not found, there would be no option but to rephrase the capital expansion programme to align with the available funding," Eskom said.

    Trade union Solidarity has warned that Eskom's proposed electricity tariff increases could result in more retrenchments in the mining industry, where close on 40 000 people had already lost their jobs.

    Maroga said the utility's capacity expansion would involve "pain" for the local economy, but "providing power to South Africa is fundamental. Power is like oxygen to the economy."

    The magnitude of the mooted price increases is likely to deepen and prolong the local recession, and increase inflation, while the inflationary effects will hike interest rates and destroy jobs, especially in marginal businesses like high-cost gold mines.


    Maroga said three annual 45 percent increases would reduce the utility's funding shortfall for the four years to March 2013 from R80bn to R28.5bn out of a four-year budget of R413bn. During the three years to March 2013, Eskom expects to borrow R120bn.

    Over the six years ending March 2015 the utility is planning to spend R708bn in capital expenditure. On top of this Maroga said Eskom was planning to spend R242bn on energy costs excluding road maintenance, non-Eskom generation, power imports and environmental levies.

    The utility is also planning to spend R265bn on operating costs, including employee costs and maintenance.

    Andrew Etzinger, an Eskom spokesman, said the utility produced electricity at an average cost of 26c a kWh and sold power at an average price of 33c a kWh.

    Three annual power price increases would take the local price of electricity to almost R1.01 a kWh.

    Cosatu said it was "extremely angry" at the "outrageous and insensitive request for a whopping" 45 percent a year electricity tariff hike for the next three years.

    "Cosatu rejects it outright, especially given the continued absence of clear and effective measures to protect the poor."

    Thembani Bukula, the head of electricity regulation at the National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa), declined to comment on Eskom's application. Maroga said Nersa was likely to make its decision known early next year.

    Mthobeli Kolisa, executive director of infrastructure services at the SA Local Government Association, said the association was still consulting its municipalities regarding the power price increases Eskom sought and declined to comment further.

    Maroga said independent power producers could contribute 2 189 megawatts of power to Eskom by March 2013.
  • BOOKMARK THIS STORY

    Social bookmarking allows users to save and categorise a personal collection of bookmarks and share them with others. This is different to using your own browser bookmarks which are available using the menus within your web browser.

    Use the links below to share this article on the social bookmarking site of your choice.

    Read more about social bookmarking at Wikipedia - Social Bookmarking

    Showing page 1 of 5 comment pages, 44 total comments
    16 Weeks ago Deena Naidoo wrote :
    If this is not price fixing, what is?
    16 Weeks ago Deena Naidoo wrote :
    As I was telling the guys, refuse to pay the 1st increase, they laughed at me saying, don't worry, the price will drop soon as the economical position gers better. Then came the 2nd increase, then came the petitions etc, etc, etc. Now they're demanding a further 45% increase. REFUSE to pay, Escom must first explain to the public as to why the CEO received such a hugh increase in bonuses even whilst they were demanding an increase. My advice to the public, invest in solar power now and then tell Escom to jump. They'll probably ask, 'how high'. It's like the dog that bites the hand that feeds it. Question, why isn't Julius Malema and his bunch of croonies not dancing like cut throats as they were doing recently against Nedbank?????
    16 Weeks ago Anonymous wrote :
    It makes no difference how much of the increase is going towards performance bonuses. Firstly, the executive has not received bonuses at all this year, and last year took home a very small portion of their annual bonuses. If you are aiming at retaining skill within a company like Eskom, you have to pay market related salaries, otherwise your skill are just going to move elsewhere and command a salary that is triple what they earn at Eskom. Secondly, the problem with the Eskom debt and the reason as to why the debt exists in addition to the lack of capacity is wholly attributable to governments obsession with privatisation and the neoliberal policies which are followed by the current and previous administrations. Thirdly, the executive at Eskom have worked harder in the past year than they ever have, and deserve some kind of market related compensation. It is the unfortunate truth that aside from the minority of academics and government hospital doctors, people want to earn what they are worth, and if Eskom does not pay their exec accordingly, they have no hope of keeping anyone worth keeping working for them. Anyone opposed to the price increase is not a practical person. Eskom held off on increases since 1994 so that a developing country could develop, and now that they are in debt, and have no money, they should be entitled to increase. They currently provide the cheapest electricity in the world, and South Africans are just a bunch of unappreciative and spoiled babies!
    16 Weeks ago Clintonv wrote :
    45% per year for 3 years....if you pay R1000 now it will be R1450 then R2102,50 then on year 3 it would be R3048,63 Now that is a way to give better bonuses and increases. Any bets after 3 years they will be bankrupt again and demand another 50% ???? Now they ask why skilled people leave the country
    16 Weeks ago Matrix wrote :
    This is sickening. Why do we pay taxes in the first place! Everybody should say enough is enough and make a stand against Eskom and the likes of them. There are so many things we can do, if we just made the effort. And what about the millions of citizens who get electricity for free?
    16 Weeks ago Anonymous wrote :
    The thing that worries me the most, is the effect this price increases will have on pensioners. My parents and grandparents are struggling to get by as it is now. They will not have any money left for food and basic necessities if this price hikes continue as planned.
    16 Weeks ago Anonymous wrote :
    Macro Economics for dummies or should I say government: SA currently imports more than it exports...True? The Rand has got stronger effecting exports....True? Foreign countries are purchasing from the likes of India and China because they are more competitive....True? By increasing the electricity tariff by 45% per year is not 135% it is way more. These costs need to be passed off to the consumer of paid for in the prices we offer on our products and services to the world which pushes SA further out of the ballpark. These costs will have to be absorbed by increasing prices on EVERYTHING, inflation will be rampant and you guess it....Interest rates will go up to curb OUR spending not that of eskom. In conclusion, yes the country needs power stations due to a growing (albeit at a slower rate) economy and due to population increase however surely there was a plan a few years ago and maybe they should start looking in house for savings and collect on all those bad debts, I think they would be surprised as to how much money could be collected this way.
    16 Weeks ago Anonymous wrote :
    Simply put, we are soooo scr@wed now. Everything is going to go up. Manufacturing will want to cover these costs, supermarkets will put the prices up, considering they already over charging us in the region of 30%. We knew electricy was a looming disaster, and already there are hints abt water. And the headlines of the air quality. Simple. We are soooooo scr@wed now. Considering how many are already not paying
    16 Weeks ago RGP wrote :
    Of Course Eishkom wants 3 increases of 45% each. At that rate , 1KwH will cost R1.54 . If they had a single increase of 151% , 1KwH would cost R1.26 all excluding tax of course. This doesnt take into account Service charge, 3 increases = R7.45/DAY, Network charge , 3 increases = R4.72/DAY, plus Environmental levy(whatever that may be), 3 increases = R0.06/KwH. Our magnificent brains trust ie. Govt, Eishkom , etc will eventually kill the golden goose that is becomming increasingly more constipated. All because of the communist mantra of Cronieism, Nepotisim, rewarding incapable party faithfull with positions far beyond their capabilities!
    16 Weeks ago CATCH 22 wrote :
    TC you are spot on. unfortunately those that can afford or nearly afford to pay are being punished. Can you imagine forcing Sakhile or other poor areas being forced to pay more {or at all} there would be violent protest and this the government would not be happy with. Also if we as responsible citizens had to use less electricity not enough money would come in so we will be charged even more. CATCH 22!!!!

         

    BUSINESS SERVICES
    Awesome UK Lotto's
    Business Directory
    Car Insurance
    Car Insurance for Women
    City Guide
    Insurance Quote
    Life Insurance
    Life Insurance for Women
    Maps & Direction
    Medical Aid
    Meetings Africa
    Mobile Business Directory
    Online Shopping
    Personal Loans
    Play Huge Lottos
    Property Search
    Travel Specials

    MOBILE SERVICES
     Get Business Headlines & Indicators
     on your phone - dial *120*IOL*5#
     Click here to find out more (SA only)



    News


    Markets


    Technology News


    Company News


    International